Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Breast cancer Introduction

Incidence

Carcinoma of the breast is the most common cancer in women in the United States (32%) and is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in women (15%).
Estimated new cases and deaths from breast cancer (women only) in the United States in 2005:
  • New cases: 211,240.
  • Deaths: 40,410.
The lifetime risk for women of being diagnosed with breast cancer is currently about 1 in 8.

Gender

Breast cancer is relatively uncommon in men; the female-to-male ratio is approximately 100:1.

Age

The risk of developing breast cancer increases with age. Only about 0.8% of breast cancers occur in women < 30 years old and approximately 6.5% develop in women between 30 and 40 years old. Most cases occur in patients over 40 years of age.

Race and ethnicity

White women have a higher overall rate of breast cancer than African-American women; however, this difference is not apparent until after menopause. American Asian and Hispanic women have approximately half the incidence of American Caucasian women. Native-American women extremely low risk of developing breast cancer.

Geography

The incidence of breast cancer is significantly higher in the United States and European countries such as the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Switzerland than in India, Japan, Thailand, Nigeria. It has been suggested that these trends in breast cancer incidence may be related to dietary fat consumption

1. Family history

The degree of relativity


  • The relative risk of patients with an affected first-degree relative (mother, daughter, or sister) is 1.7 times higher when compared to controls without affected family members.
  • Having two first-degree relatives affected (female or male) increases relative risk by more than 4-6 timeswhen compared to patients without this risk factor.

Age of affected relative at time of diagnosis


  • A patient with a mother diagnosed when younger than 60 years is at 2 times increased risk.

  • Premenopausal onset of the disease in a first-degree relative is associated with a 3 times increase in breast cancer risk.

Bilateral breast cancer in a relative


  • Bilateral cancer in a first-degree relative may increase risk by more than 6 times.
  • The relative risk for a woman whose first-degree relative developed bilateral breast cancer prior to menopause is nearly 9 times.

2. Menstrual and reproductive factors

  • Early menarche (before the age of 12) has been associated with a two-fold increase in risk.
  • Late menopause (after the age of 55) also have a two-fold increase in the risk of developing breast cancer.
  • A first full term pregnancy after the age of 30 is associated with a two-fold increase in risk when compared to those with an early first full term pregnancy.

3. Contraceptive pills and Hormone replacement therapy

Epidemiologic data provide strong evidence for an association between plasma estrogens and breast cancer risk.

Oral contraceptive pills


  • In 1996 a large meta-analysis showed that a history of recent oral contraceptive use, rather than the duration of use, was a predictor of breast cancer risk.

  • This data was based on older high-dose and moderate-dose oral contraceptive pills and not the recently used low-dose pills.

Hormone replacement therapy

In regard to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or postmenopausal hormone use, results from the Women�s Health Initiative (WHI) showed that the overall risks of a combined estrogen and progestin outweigh the benefits.

  • In the arm taking estrogen plus progestin there was a 26% increase in risk of invasive breast cancer, compared with the arm taking a placebo. In addition, in women taking these hormones, there were increased risks of heart disease, stroke, and blood clots.

  • In the estrogen-alone arm there was no increase in breast cancer risk reported. The  trial also concluded that estrogen alone does not appear to increase or decrease a woman�s risk of heart disease, although it does appear to increase her risk of stroke and decrease her risk of hip fracture.

4. Genetic factors

Genetic risk factors account for less than 10% of breast cancers.

Autosomal dominant inheritance is seen in:



  • Muir-Torre syndrome

  • Cowden disease

  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
BRCA1, although rare, accounts for 45% of high-risk familial inheritances of breast cancer. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma is close to 50% when younger than 50 years and exceeds 80% prior to 65 years.

Autosomal recessive inheritance is seen in:


  • Ataxia-telangiectasia

5. Proliferative breast diseases

This category comprises the following conditions moderate or florid epithelial hyperplasia, with or without atypica, sclerosing adenosis, and small duct papillomas.
Other benign conditions (mild ductal hyperplasia, adenosis, cystic changes, apocrine metaplasia) are not associated with increased risk.

Histological variants


  • Epithelial hyperplasia: Involves proliferation of epithelial layers usually three or more layers in thickness.

  • Sclerosing adenosis: Involves increased numbers of benign ducts distorted by sclerosis.

  • Papillomas: Papillomas are composed of bland epithelial cells with a well defined fibrovascular core, a basal myoepithelial layer, and intact basement membrane.

  • Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Is associated with proliferation of ductal epithelial cells sharing some but not all the features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

  • Atypical lobular hyperplasia: Is the proliferation of lobular cells sharing features of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) but filling or distending less than 50% of the acini within the lobule.

Risk associated with each type


  • Moderate or florid ductal hyperplasia and sclerosing adenosis, papillomas (proliferative breast disease without atypia) pose only a slightly increased risk of breast cancer (1.5-2.0 times).

  • Benign proliferative changes with atypical hyperplasia, such as atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia. These may increase relative risk by 4 times. Patients who have a family history of breast cancer along with a personal history of atypical epithelial hyperplasia have an 8-fold increase in breast cancer risk when compared with patients with a positive family history alone and an 11-fold increase in breast cancer risk when compared with patients who do not have atypical hyperplasia and have a negative family history.

  • Noninvasive carcinoma (ductal carcinoma in situ or lobular carcinoma in situ) on previous biopsy: Lobular carcinoma in situ, markedly increases risk (8-11 times).
  • Personal history of breast cancer: This also is a recognized risk factor. This factor depends on patient age at time of diagnosis. Risk is increased for younger women. The risk is about1% per year from the time of diagnosis of an initial sporadic breast cancer. The risk for development of a second primary breast cancer is significantly higher for women with hereditary breast cancer, approximately 5% per year (50%-60% lifetime risk). Also in cases with history of endometrial, ovarian, or colon cancer.

6. Radiation exposure


  • Atomic bomb survivors: An increased rate of breast cancer has been observed in survivors of the atomic bomb explosions in Japan, with a peak latency period of 15-20 years.

  • Radiation therapy: Patients with Hodgkin�s disease who are treated with mantle irradiation, particularly women who are younger than age 20 at the time of radiation therapy were found to have an increased incidence of breast cancer.

7. High-fat diet

Diets that are high in fat have been associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. It has been suggested that differences in dietary fat content may account for the variations in breast cancer incidence observed among different countries.

8. Obesity

Alterations in endogenous estrogen levels secondary to obesity may enhance breast cancer risk (aromatization of testosterone to estradiol occurs in the adipose tissue).

9. Alcohol

Moderate alcohol intake (two or more drinks per day) appears to modestly increase breast cancer risk.

10. Socioeconomic status

The incidence of breast cancer is greater in women of higher socioeconomic background. This relationship is most likely related to lifestyle differences, such as age at first birth.


Breast cancer
Symptoms and signs


  Breast Cancer News

  Breast Cancer
- Introduction
- Causes
- Clinical Picture
- Screening
- Diagnosis
- Pathology
- Staging
- Treatment

Local symptoms

The left breast is involved more frequently than the right, and the most common locations of the disease are the upper outer quadrant and retroareolar region.
  1. Asymptomatic: Increasing numbers of breast malignancies are being discovered in asymptomatic patients through the use of screening mammography.
  2. Breast lumps are detectable in 80% of patients with breast cancer and constitute the most common sign on history and physical examination. The typical breast cancer mass has a dominant character and tends to be:
    • Unilateral
    • Solitary
    • Irregular
    • Solid
    • Hard
    • Nonmobile
    • Nontender
  3. Breast pain is the presenting symptom in approximately 5% of patients.
  4. Skin or nipple retraction in 5% of patients.
  5. Spontaneous nipple discharge through a mammary duct is the presenting symptom in approximately 2% of patients.
  6. Breast enlargement is seen in 1% of cases.
  7. Nipple crusting or erosion: This can occur inPaget's disease and is the presenting symptom in 1% of the cases

Metastasis

Lymph node metasasis
The most common regions that breast cancer may spread to in order of frequency are:

  • Bone (80%)

  • Lung (25%)

  • Liver (20%)

  • Brain (15%)

  • Other organs which include the bone marrow, brain, ovaries, spinal cord, eye (20%)

    Breast cancer
    Screening


      

    Breast self examination

    The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that:

    • Beginning in their 20s, women should be told about the benefits and limitations of breast self-examination (BSE).

    Benefits:

    • There is no data to suggest that breast self examination reduces the risk of mortality from cancer.

    • Women who performed breast self-examination were found to be more likely to have smaller tumors and less likely to have axillary node metastases than those who did not.
    A major problem with breast self-examination as a screening technique is that it is rarely performed well.

    Clinical breast examination

    The ACS recommends clinical breast examination for women:


    • Between ages 20 and 39 - every 3 years

    • Beginning at age 40 -  every year
    The clinical examination should include inspection and palpation of the breast and regional lymph nodes. If the clinician detects an abnormality, the patient should then undergo diagnostic imaging rather than screening.

    Benefits:

    • There is no data to suggest that clinical breast examination reduces the risk of mortality from cancer.
    • Approximately 20% of breast cancers are detected by clinical breast examination.

    Mammography

    Screening mammography is performed in the asymptomatic patient to detect an occult breast cancer. Currently, the American Cancer Society recommends:

    • Beginning at age 40 years - annual mammography and examination by a physician

    Benefits:


    • Mammography has a sensitivity and specificity of 90% if there is a palpable mass.

    • In impalpable cases the sensitivity and specificity are reduced to 50%.

    • It detects the majority of cases an average of 2 years prior to any perceptible clinical signs or symptoms.

    • Multiple prospective randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that mammography canreduce the mortality from breast cancer by 24% in women aged 50-74.
    This, however, does not apply to younger women, particularly those aged younger than 40 years. In addition, the sensitivity of mammography is decreased significantly in young patients with dense breast tissue and possibly with augmentation prosthesis. Mammography seldom is recommended in patients younger than 30 years. Exceptions to this rule would be young women with extensive family histories for breast cancer.

    Mammographic findings & suggestive lesions

    1. Breast masses: Stellate shape, irregular or spiculated margins suggest cancer.
    2. Evaluating the breast for calcifications: Pleomorphic calcifications less than 0.5 mm (microcalcifications).
    3. Architectural distortion and asymmetry suggest cancer.
    4. Skin thickening
    5. Nipple changes
    6. Axillary adenopathy

    BI-RADS

    The American College of Radiology established the standard for classification of radiographic abnormalities, known as the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
    (BI-RADS), as follows:

    BI-RAD ClassDescriptionRecommendation
    0Incomplete examinationUsually requiring further imaging or evaluation
    INormalFollow-up study in 1 year
    IIBenignFollow-up study in 1 year
    IIILikely to be benignFollow-up mammogram in 6 months
    IVSuspiciousConsider biopsy
    VHighly suspicious for malignancyBiopsy recommended

    Ultrasound

    As an adjunct to mammography, ultrasonography (US) can be particularly useful in younger patients or women with fibrocystic change and should be the initial investigation for palpable lesions in women younger than 35 years. Its main use remains in distinguishing solid from cystic lesions. In the workup of nonpalpable lesions, US can be used to guide a needle biopsy or to place a localizing wire to direct an excisional biopsy.

    Benefits


    • In palpable masses it sensitivity and specificity are about 95%.

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    MRI is a particularly useful modality for detailing architectural abnormalities in the breast and can help detect lesions as small as 2-3 mm. MRI should be used in scarred breasts, implants, multifocal lesions, and for borderline lesions planned for breast conservation.

    Benefits


    • Has a sensitivity approaching 100% but its specificity is only 50%.

    Scintigraphy

    The label typically used is technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, a compound that concentrates in mitochondria and whose efflux is related to expression of the multidrug resistance protein. Therefore, the size of the signal distinguishes the high metabolic rate of a malignant tumor and may help predict resistance to chemotherapy.
    Scintimammography is less sensitive than MRI for lesions smaller than 1 cm, is more specific for palpable lesions and is useful for detecting axillary involvement. It can also be useful in cases with impalpable masses due to its high specificity in this setting.

    Benefits


    • Has a sensitivity and specificity of 90% in detection of impalpable masses.

    Positron emission tomography (PET)

    PET is the most sensitive and specific of all the imaging modalities for breast disease. However, it is also one of the most expensive and least widely available. PET is useful in axillary assessment, scarred breasts, and multifocal lesions.

    Benefits


    • Has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 100%.

      Breast cancer
      Diagnosis


        Breast Cancer

      FNAC (Fine needle aspiration cytology)

      Benefits:

      • FNAC (Fine needle aspiration cytology) from breast mass: sensitivity 95% & specificity 98%.
      However, it should not be used for diagnosing lymph node metastasis (only excisional biopsy). One drawback of FNAC is that it cannot differentiate between invasive and insitu cancers as only cells are seen and the architecture cannot be evaluated as in biopsies. Aspiration of a simple benign breast cyst should yield non-bloody fluid and result in complete resolution of the lesion.

      Ultrasound /  stereotactic core biopsy

      This technique is helpful in cases where there are findings in the mammography. A wire or needle guided lumpectomy can follow this procedure.

      Benefits


      • Wide-bore needle biopsy is less sensitive but more specific when compared to FNAC (specificity 100%)

      Excisional biopsy

      An excisional biopsy, in which the entire breast mass is removed, definitively establishes the diagnosis. When the mass is extremely large, an incisional biopsy (which entails removal of only a portion of the mass) may be more appropriate.

      • Specificity of 100%.

      Ductal lavage

      Ductal lavage is currently being developed and analyzed as a minimally invasive tool to identify cellular atypia within breast ducts in women who are already at high risk for developing breast cancer. Preliminary results indicate that this method has a low sensitivity and specificity(Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004;96:1488-1489,1510-1517)

0 comments:

"zbody"